The translation isn't very good but I didn't have time to find the English version. Who really gives a shit about the text anyway???

NEW YORK - "my head e' an idiot. E' involved in arrogating way all the week ": these words are enough in order to justify a lay-off, after the normal reading of the email personal of one working from part of its employer; reading authorized from one permissive legislation a lot piu' in treatment topic gives you personal (and justified from piu' the important and pressing requirements of fight to the terrorism).
"In our ordering the violation of the confidentiality of an email corresponds substantially to the violation of the correspondence, in a generalized manner, like contained in the Constitutional charter to the art. 15"- the Avv has said. Andrea Lisi (scint.it) - "and the confidentiality of the protected correspondence e' also from the criminal code, in which, to the art. 616 c.p., e' operated one balancing between correspondence to epistolare, telegraphic, telephone, computer science or data transmission."
"In Italy" - he has concluded Lisi - "for a similar case the Court of Milan, 10 May 2002, thought the reading from part of the employer of some email not punile business that had carried to the lay-off of the worker".

More pics good would be very!